Royal Enfield Classic 350 (Chrome Red/Bronze) VS Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS (Oct 2025)

Royal Enfield Classic 350 (Chrome Red/Bronze) VS Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS

BikeBD brings you comparison of Royal Enfield Classic 350 (Chrome Red/Bronze) and Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS . The showroom price of Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS is 483000 and price of Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS is 274000 . Apart from prices, you can also find comparison of these bikes based on displacement, mileage, performance, and many more parameters. Comparison between these bikes have been carried out to help users make correct buying decision between Royal Enfield Classic 350 (Chrome Red/Bronze) and Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS .

Search Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Search Another Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Royal Enfield Classic 350 (Chrome Red/Bronze) VS Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS Specifications

Bike Information

Bike Name:	Royal Enfield Classic 350 (Chrome Red/Bronze)	Bajaj Avenger 160 ABS
CC:	350	160
Regular Price:	483000 BDT	274000 BDT
Bike Type:	Cruiser	Cruiser
Distributor/Seller:	IFAD Motors Ltd	Distributor/Seller Name
Model Year:	2024	2019
Brand Origin:	England	India
Made In:	India	India
Assemble In:	Bangladesh	Bangladesh

Engine

Engine Type	4 Stroke, Air-Oil Cooled Engine, Spark Ignition, Single Cylinder	4-stroke
Maximum Power	19.93	14.8
Maximum Torque	27	13.7
Bore	72 mm	58 mm
Stroke	85.8 mm	60.7 mm
Compression Ratio	9.5 : 1
No of Cylinders	1	1
Valves	2	2 Valve
Fuel Supply	Fuel Injection	Fuel Injection

Transmission

Transmission Type	Manual	Manual
No of Gears	5	5
Clutch Type	Wet-multiplate	Wet-multiplate

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis Type	Twin Downtube Spine Frame	Diamond Frame
Front Suspension	Twin tube emulsion shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload	Telescopic With Double Anti Friction Bush
Rear Suspension	Telescopic, 41 mm forks, 130 mm travel	5 Step Adjustable Twin Shock Absorber

Brakes

Front Brake Type	Single Disc	Disc ABS
Rear Brake Type	Disc Brake	Drum Brake
Front Brake Diameter	153 Mm	130 mm
Rear Brake Diameter	1	1
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)	Single-Channel	Yes

Wheels & Tires

Front Tire Size	Single-Channel	Yes
Rear Tire Size	120/80-18	130/90-15
Tubeless Tires	tubeless	tubeless

Dimensions

Overall Length	2145 Mm	2210 mm
Overall Width	785 Mm	806 mm
Height	1090 Mm	1070 mm
Ground Clearance	170 Mm	169 mm
Weight	195 kg	156 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	13 L	13L
Wheelbase	1390 Mm	1490 mm

Electricals

Battery Type	lead-acid	mf
Battery Voltage	12v	12v
Head Light	Halogen	Halogen
Tail Light	halogen	led
Indicators	halogen	halogen

Features

Speedometer	analog	digital
Odometer	digital	digital
RPM Meter	Analog	Digital
Handle Type	Cruiser Type	Not Available
Seat Type	Single-Seat	Single-Seat
Passenger Grab Rail	yes	yes
Engine Kill Switch	Info-Not-Available	yes

Disclaimer
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.

Bike comparisons by our experts

Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why

2017-12-08 22:29:41
Saleh

Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why

Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

2021-06-09 06:49:00
Jahid Hasan Jojo

Suzuki Gixxer Price starts at TK. 186,950 BDT which is Rs. 12,372 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced atTk. 167,300 BDT. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine.

pulsar 150 vs fzs v2 comparison

2022-02-16 06:34:00
imran

You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Yamaha Fzs v2.

Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2

2012-12-03 21:00:16
Arif Raihan Opu

Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2

TVS Apache RTR 150 VS Bajaj Pulsar 150 : Comparison Review

2015-01-31 02:53:00
Shuvo

Bikes are Bajaj Pulsar 150 and TVS Apache 150 cc. I am going to make comparison in between TVS Apache RTR 150 vs Bajaj Pulsar 150 neutrally

Honda Dream Neo VS Honda Livo 110 Comparison Review

2018-05-05 20:50:50
Ashik Mahmud

Honda Dream Neo VS Honda Livo 110 Comparison Review