Honda CB77 1964 VS Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005) (Dec 2025)

Honda CB77 1964 VS Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005)

BikeBD brings you comparison of Honda CB77 1964 and Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005) . The showroom price of Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005) is 0 and price of Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005) is 0 . Apart from prices, you can also find comparison of these bikes based on displacement, mileage, performance, and many more parameters. Comparison between these bikes have been carried out to help users make correct buying decision between Honda CB77 1964 and Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005) .

Search Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Search Another Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Honda CB77 1964 VS Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005) Specifications

Bike Information

Bike Name:	Honda CB77 1964	Bajaj Pulsar 180 DTSi ETEC (2005)
CC:	300	180
Regular Price:	0 BDT	0 BDT
Bike Type:	Standard	Standard
Distributor/Seller:
Model Year:	1964	2005
Brand Origin:		bajaj
Made In:
Assemble In:

Engine

Engine Type	Twin, four-stroke	Single cylinder, four-stroke
Maximum Power	27.89	15.96
Maximum Torque		14.7
Bore	60.0 mm	63.5 Mm
Stroke	54.0 mm	54.4 Mm
Compression Ratio	8.1:1	9.5:1
No of Cylinders		1
Valves		2 Valve
Fuel Supply	Carburettor	Carburetor

Transmission

Transmission Type	Manual	Manual
No of Gears	5	5
Clutch Type	Info Not Available	Wet-multiplate

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis Type	Tubular Steel	Round tube steel cradle
Front Suspension	Telescopic	Conventional Telescopic
Rear Suspension	Twin Shock	Gas charged Dual shock

Brakes

Front Brake Type	Drum Brake	Single Disc
Rear Brake Type	Drum Brake	Drum Brake
Front Brake Diameter
Rear Brake Diameter		1
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)	No	No

Wheels & Tires

Front Tire Size	No	No
Rear Tire Size	3-18	100/90-17
Tubeless Tires	tubetyre	tubetyre

Dimensions

Overall Length		1990 Mm
Overall Width		750 Mm
Height		1120 Mm
Ground Clearance		165 Mm
Weight	159.0 kg	140.0 Kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	14.00 litres	15.00 Litres
Wheelbase	1300 Mm	1330 Mm

Electricals

Battery Type	lead-acid	Info-Not-Available
Battery Voltage	12v	Info Not Available
Head Light	Halogen	Halogen
Tail Light	halogen	halogen
Indicators	halogen	halogen

Features

Speedometer	analog	analog
Odometer	analog	analog
RPM Meter	Analog	Analog
Handle Type	Pipe handle bar	Pipe handle bar
Seat Type	Single-Seat	Single-Seat
Passenger Grab Rail	no	yes
Engine Kill Switch	no	no

Disclaimer
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.

Compare with similar bikes

Honda CB77 1961

Price: 0

Honda CB77 1962

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda CB77 1962

Price: 0

Honda CB77 1963

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda CB77 1963

Price: 0

Honda CB77 1964

Price: 0

See Compare

Bike comparisons by our experts

pulsar 150 vs fz v3 difference

2022-02-02 04:51:00
imran

You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Yamaha Fz v3.

pulsar 150 vs tvs raider 125 comparison

2022-02-24 03:19:00
imran

You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Tvs raider 125.

Honda CD80 VS Runner AD80S Comparison Review

2017-09-21 04:54:53
Saleh

Honda CD80 and Runner AD80S, both classic 80cc bikes in Bangladesh, offer distinct features. CD80 emphasizes efficiency and longevity, while AD80S blends power, speed, and style. The choice depends on individual preferences and priorities.

pulsar 150 vs discover 125 difference

2022-02-14 02:45:00
imran

You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Bajaj Discover 125.

Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review

2019-10-03 07:01:36
Arif Raihan Opu

Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.

TVS Metro ES VS Bajaj Platina ES : Comparison Review

2017-04-24 23:03:30
Saleh

TVS Metro ES VS Bajaj Platina ES : Comparison Review