Yamaha WR125X 2012 VS Honda CRF 50 F 2004
Yamaha WR125X 2012 VS Honda CRF 50 F 2004 Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
125 |
50 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Off Road |
Off Road |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
2012 |
2004 |
|
Brand Origin: |
Japan |
Japan |
|
Made In: |
|
Japan |
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
|
Maximum Power |
14 |
|
|
Maximum Torque |
12.2 |
|
|
Bore |
52.0 |
39.0 Mm |
|
Stroke |
58.6 |
41.4 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
11.2:1 |
10.0:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
|
|
Valves |
4 |
|
|
Fuel Supply |
Fuel Injection |
Carburator |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
5 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Info Not Available |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Steel double cradle |
|
|
Front Suspension |
Telescopic forks |
Inverted telescopic fork |
|
Rear Suspension |
Swingarm, link suspension, Monoshock |
Single-shock |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Drum Brake |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Drum Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
220 mm |
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
|
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
140/70-17 |
|
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubetyre |
tubetyre |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2095 mm |
|
|
Overall Width |
|
|
|
Height |
|
|
|
Ground Clearance |
255 mm |
|
|
Weight |
127.0 kg |
|
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
8.50 litres |
3.02 litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1430 mm |
|
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Battery Voltage |
Info Not Available |
Info Not Available |
|
Head Light |
Halogen |
Info Not Available |
|
Tail Light |
halogen |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Indicators |
halogen |
Info-Not-Available |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
analog |
|
Odometer |
digital |
analog |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Analog |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
Single-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
no |
no |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
no |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
-
2020-03-28 21:24:26 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
-
2017-12-08 22:29:41 -
Saleh
Yamaha FZS-FI VS Fazer FI - Which To Choose & Why
pulsar 150 vs ns 160 which is better
-
2022-02-16 07:16:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Bajaj Pulsar NS 160.
Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review
-
2017-10-03 21:39:56 -
Saleh
Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
-
2018-01-31 23:32:47 -
Ashik Mahmud
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
r15 v3 vs rc 125 which is better
-
2022-01-13 03:03:00 -
imran
Explore Yamaha R15 V3 & KTM RC 125 specs for a thrilling ride. High-performance engines, sleek designs, and cutting-edge features await you.