Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 VS KTM 50 SX (Jan 2026)

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 VS KTM 50 SX

BikeBD brings you comparison of Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 and KTM 50 SX . The showroom price of KTM 50 SX is 0 and price of KTM 50 SX is 0 . Apart from prices, you can also find comparison of these bikes based on displacement, mileage, performance, and many more parameters. Comparison between these bikes have been carried out to help users make correct buying decision between Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 and KTM 50 SX .

Search Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Search Another Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 VS KTM 50 SX Specifications

Bike Information

Bike Name:	Yamaha WR 426 F 2002	KTM 50 SX
CC:	400	50
Regular Price:	0 BDT	0 BDT
Bike Type:	Dirt Bike	Dirt Bike
Distributor/Seller:
Model Year:
Brand Origin:
Made In:
Assemble In:

Engine

Engine Type	Single cylinder, four-stroke	Single cylinder, 2-stroke
Maximum Power
Maximum Torque
Bore	95.0 mm	39.5 mm
Stroke	60.1 mm	40.7 mm
Compression Ratio	12.5:1
No of Cylinders		1
Valves
Fuel Supply	Carburettor

Transmission

Transmission Type	Manual	Manual
No of Gears	5	0
Clutch Type	Info Not Available	Info Not Available

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis Type
Front Suspension	Info Not Available	XACT 35 WP Upside-Down fork, Ø 35 mm, 200.6 mm
Rear Suspension	Info Not Availlable	XACT WP mono shock, 190.5 mm

Brakes

Front Brake Type	Single Disc	Disc Brake
Rear Brake Type	Disc Brake	Disc Brake
Front Brake Diameter
Rear Brake Diameter		1
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)	No	No

Wheels & Tires

Front Tire Size	No	No
Rear Tire Size	130/90-18	2.75-10
Tubeless Tires	tubetyre	tubeless

Dimensions

Overall Length
Overall Width
Height
Ground Clearance		233 Mm
Weight	112.5 kg	42.5 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	12.77 Litres	2.3
Wheelbase		1026 Mm

Electricals

Battery Type	lead-acid	Info-Not-Available
Battery Voltage	12v	Info Not Available
Head Light	Halogen	Info Not Available
Tail Light	halogen	Info-Not-Available
Indicators	halogen	Info-Not-Available

Features

Speedometer	analog	Info-Not-Available
Odometer	analog	Info-Not-Available
RPM Meter	Analog	Info-Not-Available
Handle Type	Pipe handle bar	Pipe handle bar
Seat Type	Single-Seat	Single-Seat
Passenger Grab Rail	no	Info-Not-Available
Engine Kill Switch	no	yes

Disclaimer
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.

Compare with similar bikes

Yamaha WR 400 F 2000

Price: 0

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002

Price: 0

See Compare

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002

Price: 0

Honda XR 400 R 2002

Price: 0

See Compare

Bike comparisons by our experts

Honda CB150R Streetfire VS Suzuki GSX-S150 Comparison Review

2017-12-03 02:10:00
Saleh

Among them Honda CB150R Streetfire & Suzuki GSX-S150 are now in position of hard competition. Both the machine featured premium hence the rivalry is on peak position between them.

TVS Stryker 125 VS Hero Ignitor 125 Comparison Review

2019-01-13 09:29:58
Ashik Mahmud

TVS Stryker 125 VS Hero Ignitor 125 Comparison Review

TVS Apache RTR 150 VS Bajaj Pulsar 150 : Comparison Review

2015-01-31 02:53:00
Shuvo

Bikes are Bajaj Pulsar 150 and TVS Apache 150 cc. I am going to make comparison in between TVS Apache RTR 150 vs Bajaj Pulsar 150 neutrally

Yamaha SZ-RR VS Honda CB Trigger Comparison Review

2017-07-26 22:45:35
Saleh

Yamaha SZ-RR VS Honda CB Trigger Comparison Review

Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

2021-06-09 06:49:00
Jahid Hasan Jojo

Suzuki Gixxer Price starts at TK. 186,950 BDT which is Rs. 12,372 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced atTk. 167,300 BDT. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine.

Honda CD80 VS Runner AD80S Comparison Review

2017-09-21 04:54:53
Saleh

Honda CD80 and Runner AD80S, both classic 80cc bikes in Bangladesh, offer distinct features. CD80 emphasizes efficiency and longevity, while AD80S blends power, speed, and style. The choice depends on individual preferences and priorities.