Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 VS Kawasaki KLX 140 (May 2026)

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 VS Kawasaki KLX 140

BikeBD brings you comparison of Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 and Kawasaki KLX 140 . The showroom price of Kawasaki KLX 140 is 0 and price of Kawasaki KLX 140 is 0 . Apart from prices, you can also find comparison of these bikes based on displacement, mileage, performance, and many more parameters. Comparison between these bikes have been carried out to help users make correct buying decision between Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 and Kawasaki KLX 140 .

Search Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Search Another Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002 VS Kawasaki KLX 140 Specifications

Bike Information

Bike Name:	Yamaha WR 426 F 2002	Kawasaki KLX 140
CC:	400	150
Regular Price:	0 BDT	0 BDT
Bike Type:	Dirt Bike	Dirt Bike
Distributor/Seller:
Model Year:
Brand Origin:
Made In:
Assemble In:

Engine

Engine Type	Single cylinder, four-stroke	Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valves, SOHC
Maximum Power
Maximum Torque
Bore	95.0 mm	58 mm
Stroke	60.1 mm	54.4 mm
Compression Ratio	12.5:1	9.5:1
No of Cylinders		1
Valves		2
Fuel Supply	Carburettor	Carburetor

Transmission

Transmission Type	Manual	Manual
No of Gears	5	5
Clutch Type	Info Not Available	Wet-multiplate

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis Type		Perimeter, Box-Section, High Tensile Steel
Front Suspension	Info Not Available	33 mm telescopic fork
Rear Suspension	Info Not Availlable	Uni-Trak with aluminium single shock; piggyback reservoir; adjustable preload; adjustable compression and rebound dampin

Brakes

Front Brake Type	Single Disc	Single Disc
Rear Brake Type	Disc Brake	Disc Brake
Front Brake Diameter		190 mm
Rear Brake Diameter		1
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)	No	No

Wheels & Tires

Front Tire Size	No	No
Rear Tire Size	130/90-18	4.10-18
Tubeless Tires	tubetyre	tubeless

Dimensions

Overall Length		2005 mm
Overall Width		790 mm
Height		1135 mm
Ground Clearance		315 mm
Weight	112.5 kg	99 Kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	12.77 Litres	5.8 Liters
Wheelbase		1330 mm

Electricals

Battery Type	lead-acid	mf
Battery Voltage	12v	12v
Head Light	Halogen	Not Available
Tail Light	halogen	Info-Not-Available
Indicators	halogen	Info-Not-Available

Features

Speedometer	analog	analog
Odometer	analog	analog
RPM Meter	Analog	Analog
Handle Type	Pipe handle bar	Pipe handle bar
Seat Type	Single-Seat	Single-Seat
Passenger Grab Rail	no	Info-Not-Available
Engine Kill Switch	no	Info-Not-Available

Disclaimer
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.

Compare with similar bikes

Yamaha WR 400 F 2000

Price: 0

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002

Price: 0

See Compare

Yamaha WR 426 F 2002

Price: 0

Honda XR 400 R 2002

Price: 0

See Compare

Bike comparisons by our experts

Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2

2012-12-03 21:00:16
Arif Raihan Opu

Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2

Yamaha FZS vs Honda CB Trigger Comparison - Owner Experience

2016-10-01 07:12:49
Saleh

Yamaha FZS vs Honda CB Trigger Comparison - Owner Experience

Suzuki Gixxer vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

2021-06-09 06:49:00
Jahid Hasan Jojo

Suzuki Gixxer Price starts at TK. 186,950 BDT which is Rs. 12,372 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced atTk. 167,300 BDT. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer is powered by 155 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159.7 cc engine.

pulsar 150 vs fz v3 difference

2022-02-02 04:51:00
imran

You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Yamaha Fz v3.

Motorcycle Tire - Tubed vs Tubeless Tire Advantage & Disadvantages

2019-09-15 02:59:37
Arif Raihan Opu

Choosing between tubed and tubeless motorcycle tires? Learn the advantages and disadvantages of each in our detailed guide on BikeBD.

Honda CB Hornet 160R VS Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Feature Comparison

2018-02-23 20:06:27
Ashik Mahmud

Honda CB Hornet 160R vs. Bajaj Pulsar NS160: A comprehensive feature comparison. Both offer stunning street-sport looks, but Hornet focuses on balance and control with larger tires, while NS160 emphasizes acceleration.