Yamaha WR 400 F 2000 VS Ducati Hypermotard 698 Mono
Yamaha WR 400 F 2000 VS Ducati Hypermotard 698 Mono Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
400 |
650 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Dirt Bike |
Dirt Bike |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
2000 |
|
|
Brand Origin: |
Japan |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
Superquadro Mono, single-cylinder, 4 valves per cylinder, Desmodromic timing, 2-balance countershafts, liquid cooled |
|
Maximum Power |
|
76.34 |
|
Maximum Torque |
|
63 |
|
Bore |
|
|
|
Stroke |
|
|
|
Compression Ratio |
|
|
|
No of Cylinders |
|
1 |
|
Valves |
|
|
|
Fuel Supply |
Carburettor |
Fuel injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
5 |
0 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Info Not Available |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
|
Tubular steels trellis fram |
|
Front Suspension |
Info Not Available |
Ø 45 mm Marzocchi fully adjustable aluminium fork |
|
Rear Suspension |
Info Not Availlable |
Progressive linkage with Sachs fully adjustable monoshock. Aluminium double- sided swingarm |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Single Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
|
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
|
1 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
Dual-Channel |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
Dual-Channel |
|
Rear Tire Size |
|
160/60-17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubetyre |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
|
|
|
Overall Width |
|
|
|
Height |
|
|
|
Ground Clearance |
|
|
|
Weight |
105.5 kg |
151 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
5.30 Litres |
|
|
Wheelbase |
|
1443 Mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
lead-acid |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
12V 3Ah |
Info Not Available |
|
Head Light |
Halogen |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
halogen |
led |
|
Indicators |
halogen |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
analog |
digital |
|
Odometer |
analog |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Analog |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
Single-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
no |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
no |
Info-Not-Available |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Tvs Apache 150 RTR : A Comparison
-
2012-12-07 01:36:25 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Tvs Apache 150 RTR :A Comparison
Honda Dream Neo VS Honda Livo 110 Comparison Review
-
2018-05-05 20:50:50 -
Ashik Mahmud
Honda Dream Neo VS Honda Livo 110 Comparison Review
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
-
2020-03-28 21:24:26 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
pulsar 150 vs ns 160 which is better
-
2022-02-16 07:16:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Bajaj Pulsar NS 160.
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison
-
2020-01-26 01:01:32 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison