Yamaha Warrior 2009 VS Royal Enfield Meteor 350
Yamaha Warrior 2009 VS Royal Enfield Meteor 350 Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
1200 |
350 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
435000 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Cruiser |
Cruiser |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
2009 |
|
|
Brand Origin: |
Japan |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
V2, four-stroke |
Single-Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air-Oil Cooled Engine |
|
Maximum Power |
5.36 |
20.12 |
|
Maximum Torque |
6.1 |
27 |
|
Bore |
97.0 mm |
72 mm |
|
Stroke |
113.0 mm |
85.8 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
8.4:1 |
9.5:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
|
1 |
|
Valves |
|
2 |
|
Fuel Supply |
FI |
EFI |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
5 |
5 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Aluminum monoshock |
Twin Downtube Spine Frame |
|
Front Suspension |
41mm KYB inverted fork |
Telescopic, 41 mm forks, 130 mm travel |
|
Rear Suspension |
Single shock |
Twin tube emulsion Shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Dual Disc |
Single Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
|
270 mm |
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
|
1 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
200/50-ZR17 |
140/70-17 66P |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
238 Mm |
2140 Mm |
|
Overall Width |
935 Mm |
845 Mm |
|
Height |
|
1140 Mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
|
170 Mm |
|
Weight |
294.8 kg |
191 Kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
15.14 litres |
15 L |
|
Wheelbase |
1666 Mm |
1400 Mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
lead-acid |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
12V 3Ah |
12 V, 12Ah |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
led |
halogen |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
analog |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Analog |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Cruiser Type |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
Single-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
no |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
no |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
-
2020-03-28 21:24:26 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
r15 v3 vs rc 125 which is better
-
2022-01-13 03:03:00 -
imran
Explore Yamaha R15 V3 & KTM RC 125 specs for a thrilling ride. High-performance engines, sleek designs, and cutting-edge features await you.
pulsar 150 vs discover 125 difference
-
2022-02-14 02:45:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Bajaj Discover 125.
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
-
2018-01-31 23:32:47 -
Ashik Mahmud
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
Top Five 150cc Premium Sports Bike 2017 - Comparison Review
-
2017-05-31 22:02:27 -
Saleh
Top Five 150cc Premium Sports Bike 2017 - Comparison Review