Suzuki TU 250 VS Honda CBF600S (2008) (Jun 2026)

Suzuki TU 250 VS Honda CBF600S (2008)

BikeBD brings you comparison of Suzuki TU 250 and Honda CBF600S (2008) . The showroom price of Honda CBF600S (2008) is 0 and price of Honda CBF600S (2008) is 0 . Apart from prices, you can also find comparison of these bikes based on displacement, mileage, performance, and many more parameters. Comparison between these bikes have been carried out to help users make correct buying decision between Suzuki TU 250 and Honda CBF600S (2008) .

Search Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Search Another Bike *

Please select a valid Bike.

Suzuki TU 250 VS Honda CBF600S (2008) Specifications

Bike Information

Bike Name:	Suzuki TU 250	Honda CBF600S (2008)
CC:	250	600
Regular Price:	0 BDT	0 BDT
Bike Type:	Naked Sports	Naked Sports
Distributor/Seller:
Model Year:		2008
Brand Origin:
Made In:
Assemble In:

Engine

Engine Type	Single cylinder, four-stroke	In-line four, four-stroke
Maximum Power		74.83
Maximum Torque		59
Bore	72.0 mm
Stroke	61.2 mm
Compression Ratio	9.2:1
No of Cylinders
Valves	2
Fuel Supply	carburator	Carburator

Transmission

Transmission Type	Manual	Manual
No of Gears	5	5
Clutch Type	Wet-multiplate	Info Not Available

Chassis & Suspension

Chassis Type
Front Suspension	Telescopic, coil spring, oil damped	Info Not Available
Rear Suspension	Swing-arm type, coil spring, oil damped	Info Not Available

Brakes

Front Brake Type	Single Disc	Dual Disc
Rear Brake Type	Drum Brake	Disc Brake
Front Brake Diameter
Rear Brake Diameter
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS)	No	No

Wheels & Tires

Front Tire Size	No	No
Rear Tire Size	110/90-M18	160/60-ZR17
Tubeless Tires	tubeless	tubeless

Dimensions

Overall Length	2070 mm	2160 Mm
Overall Width	750 mm	765 Mm
Height	1075 mm	1240 Mm
Ground Clearance	125 mm
Weight	149.0 kg	222.0 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	12 L	20.00 litres
Wheelbase	1375 mm

Electricals

Battery Type	Info-Not-Available	Info-Not-Available
Battery Voltage	Info Not Available	Info Not Available
Head Light	Halogen	Halogen
Tail Light	halogen	halogen
Indicators	halogen	halogen

Features

Speedometer	analog	analog
Odometer	analog	analog
RPM Meter	Digital	Analog
Handle Type	Pipe handle bar	Pipe handle bar
Seat Type	Split-Seat	Split-Seat
Passenger Grab Rail	no	yes
Engine Kill Switch	yes	Info-Not-Available

Disclaimer
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.

Compare with similar bikes

Honda CB 250 RS (1984)

Price: 0

Honda CB 250 (2003)

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda CB 250 (2003)

Price: 0

Honda AX-1 Sports Traverse (1983)

Price: 0

See Compare

Honda AX-1 Sports Traverse (1983)

Price: 0

Bajaj Dominar 250 (2021)

Price: 0

See Compare

Bajaj Dominar 250 (2021)

Price: 0

Bajaj Dominar 250 (2023)

Price: 0

See Compare

Bajaj Dominar 250 (2023)

Price: 0

Suzuki TU 250

Price: 0

See Compare

Suzuki TU 250

Price: 0

Suzuki Inazuma 250

Price: 0

See Compare

Bike comparisons by our experts

Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review

2017-10-03 21:39:56
Saleh

Keeway RKS 100 VS Dayang Runner Bullet 100 Comparison Review

Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review

2020-03-28 21:24:26
Arif Raihan Opu

Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review

Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2

2012-12-03 21:00:16
Arif Raihan Opu

Yamaha R15 V.1 vs Yamaha R15 V.2

Yamaha RX 115 to Yamaha R15 v.2 : The Yamaha Revolution

2013-02-05 10:27:11
Shuvo

It is a Yamaha RX 115 which I personally think is one of best bike that ever touched the tarmac of Bengal. Debuted n 1981 & was into production for 20 year

Yamaha SZ-RR VS Honda CB Trigger Comparison Review

2017-07-26 22:45:35
Saleh

Yamaha SZ-RR VS Honda CB Trigger Comparison Review

Suzuki GSX-R150 vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison Review

2017-09-28 04:16:20
Saleh

The latest heartthrob Suzuki GSX-R150 & Yamaha R15 V3 already started rolling. Sequentially here is our Suzuki GSX-R150 vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison Review.