QJMOTOR SRK 921 VS Honda CBF600N (2010)
QJMOTOR SRK 921 VS Honda CBF600N (2010) Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
1000 |
600 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Naked Sports |
Naked Sports |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
2010 |
|
Brand Origin: |
China |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
4-Cylinder, 16V DOHC, Liquid-Cooled with oil radiator |
In-line four, four-stroke |
|
Maximum Power |
126.06 |
74.83 |
|
Maximum Torque |
93 |
59 |
|
Bore |
73 mm |
67.0 mm |
|
Stroke |
55 mm |
42.25 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
11.6:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
4 |
|
|
Valves |
16 |
|
|
Fuel Supply |
EFI |
Fuel injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
6 |
|
Clutch Type |
Electric |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
|
|
|
Front Suspension |
Upside down telescopic forks |
41mm telescopic fork, 120mm axle travel |
|
Rear Suspension |
Telescopic coil spring oil damped |
Monoshock damper with 7-step adjustable preload, 125mm axle travel |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Dual Disc |
Dual Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
260 mm |
220 mm |
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
4 |
|
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
Dual-Channel |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
Dual-Channel |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
190/50 ZR17 |
160/60-ZR17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2130 mm |
|
|
Overall Width |
930 mm |
|
|
Height |
1130 mm |
|
|
Ground Clearance |
140 mm |
|
|
Weight |
218.4 kg |
222.0 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
15.5L |
20.00 litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1425 mm |
|
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
12v |
Info Not Available |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
led |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
digital |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Split-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
No |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
Info-Not-Available |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
R15 V3 India vs R15 V3 Indonesia Version Comparison
-
2019-09-01 01:00:21 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Comparing Yamaha R15 V3 in India and Indonesia reveals subtle differences in specifications and features. Knowing these distinctions helps buyers make informed decisions.
r15 v3 vs v2 difference
-
2022-02-12 05:00:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the V3 and the V2 model.
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
Hero Thriller 160R Refresh VS Yamaha FZ-X
-
2023-07-08 04:50:00 -
Rafi Kabir
In the realm of two-wheeled machines, the Hero Thriller 160R Refresh and the Yamaha FZ-X stand out as compelling choices for riders seeking an exhilarating riding experience. Both bikes possess unique features and qualities that cater to different riding preferences.
pulsar 150 vs honda x blade difference
-
2022-02-08 03:55:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Honda x blade.
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison
-
2020-01-26 01:01:32 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison