QJMOTOR SRK 300S VS Benelli 302S
QJMOTOR SRK 300S VS Benelli 302S Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
300 |
300 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Naked Sports |
Naked Sports |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
|
|
Brand Origin: |
|
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
1-Cylinder, 4V DOHC, Liquid-Cooled |
In-line 2-cylinder, 4-stroke, water cooled , 4 valves for cy |
|
Maximum Power |
29.3 |
38.26 |
|
Maximum Torque |
24.5 |
26.5 |
|
Bore |
78.0 mm |
65 mm |
|
Stroke |
61.2 mm |
45.2 mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
12:01 |
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
1 |
|
Valves |
4 |
2 |
|
Fuel Supply |
EFI |
Electronic Fuel Injection with throttle body 34mm |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
6 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
|
Steel trestle in steel tubes |
|
Front Suspension |
Upside down telescopic forks |
41mm Upside Down Forks |
|
Rear Suspension |
Telescopic coil spring oil damped |
Hydraulic Mono Shock Absorber |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Single Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
240 mm |
240 mm |
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
1 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
Info-Not-Available |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
Info-Not-Available |
|
Rear Tire Size |
150/60 R17 |
150/60-R17 66 H |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2010 mm |
2130 mm |
|
Overall Width |
810 mm |
800 mm |
|
Height |
1070 mm |
1120 mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
120 mm |
140 mm |
|
Weight |
162 kg |
204 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
12.5L |
16 Liters |
|
Wheelbase |
1370 mm |
1410 mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
12v |
12 V, 8 Ah |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
led |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
digital |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Split-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
No |
no |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
pulsar 150 vs ns 160 which is better
-
2022-02-16 07:16:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Bajaj Pulsar NS 160.
r15 v3 vs rc 125 which is better
-
2022-01-13 03:03:00 -
imran
Explore Yamaha R15 V3 & KTM RC 125 specs for a thrilling ride. High-performance engines, sleek designs, and cutting-edge features await you.
Honda CUB 50 vs. Honda wave Alpha - Battle of Two Generations
-
2017-05-17 02:48:23 -
Saleh
Honda CUB 50 vs. Honda wave Alpha - Battle of Two Generations
Kawasaki Ninja 125 VS KTM RC125 Comparison Review
-
2019-08-17 01:15:48 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Kawasaki Ninja 125 VS KTM RC125 Comparison Review
TVS Apache RTR150 VS Apache RTR160 Comparison Review
-
2017-09-08 07:28:36 -
Saleh
we are expecting Apache RTR160 will hit our market soon where already RTR150 rolling gorgeously on our road. So lets see the comparison reviews.