Lifan K29 VS Hyosung Aquila GV250
Lifan K29 VS Hyosung Aquila GV250 Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
250 |
250 |
|
Regular Price: |
379999 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Cruiser |
Cruiser |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
|
|
Brand Origin: |
China |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Vertical single-cylinder, water-cooled, four-stroke |
2-Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 8-Valve, Oil Cooled, DOHC |
|
Maximum Power |
27.5 |
26.21 |
|
Maximum Torque |
23.5 |
21.37 |
|
Bore |
77 mm |
|
|
Stroke |
53.6 mm |
|
|
Compression Ratio |
11.8:1 |
|
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
2 |
|
Valves |
|
|
|
Fuel Supply |
EFI |
Fuel Injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
6 |
5 |
|
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
|
|
|
Front Suspension |
Telescopic |
Telescopic |
|
Rear Suspension |
Dual Shock Absorber |
Hydraulic Double Shock Absorber |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
|
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
2 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
130/90-15 |
150/80-15 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2230 mm |
2282 mm |
|
Overall Width |
850 mm |
875 mm |
|
Height |
1090 mm |
1096 mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
145 mm |
155 mm |
|
Weight |
165 Kg |
179 Kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
14L |
14 L |
|
Wheelbase |
1500 mm |
1515 mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
12v |
12v |
|
Head Light |
LED |
Halogen |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
halogen |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
digital |
analog |
|
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Analog |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Split-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
yes |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
yes |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Bike comparisons by our experts
TVS Stryker 125 VS Hero Ignitor 125 Comparison Review
-
2019-01-13 09:29:58 -
Ashik Mahmud
TVS Stryker 125 VS Hero Ignitor 125 Comparison Review
Yamaha R15 V.2 VS Honda CBR 150: Comparison of Two Wonders
-
2013-06-03 01:52:00 -
Shuvo
Yamaha R15 V.2 VS Honda CBR 150: Comparison of Two Wonders
Kawasaki Ninja 125 VS KTM RC125 Comparison Review
-
2019-08-17 01:15:48 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Kawasaki Ninja 125 VS KTM RC125 Comparison Review
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison
-
2020-01-26 01:01:32 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Lifan KPR150 VS KPR165-FI VS KPR165-Carb Feature Comparison
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
-
2018-01-31 23:32:47 -
Ashik Mahmud
Motorcycle Fuel Economy VS Build Quality - Which Is Preferable?
