Honda CBF600N (2012) VS Benelli 752S
Honda CBF600N (2012) VS Benelli 752S Specifications
Bike Information
Bike Name: |
||
CC: |
600 |
800 |
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
Bike Type: |
Naked Sports |
Naked Sports |
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
Model Year: |
2012 |
|
Brand Origin: |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
Engine Type |
In-line four, four-stroke |
Liquid Cooled, Inline 2 Cylinder, 4-Valves, DOHC |
Maximum Power |
74.83 |
80.45 |
Maximum Torque |
59 |
67 |
Bore |
67.0 mm |
88 mm |
Stroke |
42.5 mm |
62 mm |
Compression Ratio |
11.6:1 |
11.5:1 |
No of Cylinders |
|
2 |
Valves |
|
|
Fuel Supply |
Fuel injection |
Fuel Injection |
Transmission
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
No of Gears |
6 |
6 |
Clutch Type |
Wet-multiplate |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
Chassis Type |
|
Trestle Steel Tubes and Plates |
Front Suspension |
41mm telescopic fork, 120mm axle travel |
50 mm Upside Down Forks |
Rear Suspension |
Monoshock damper with 7-step adjustable preload, 125mm axle travel |
Swingarm with Central Shock Absorber Spring Preload Adjustable |
Brakes
Front Brake Type |
Dual Disc |
Disc Brake |
Rear Brake Type |
Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
Front Brake Diameter |
|
260 mm |
Rear Brake Diameter |
|
2 |
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
Dual-Channel |
Wheels & Tires
Front Tire Size |
No |
Dual-Channel |
Rear Tire Size |
160/60-ZR17 |
180/55-ZR17 |
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
tubeless |
Dimensions
Overall Length |
2160 Mm |
2119 mm |
Overall Width |
765 Mm |
806 mm |
Height |
1240 Mm |
1128 mm |
Ground Clearance |
130 Mm |
180 mm |
Weight |
213.0 kg |
220 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity |
20.00 litres |
15 L |
Wheelbase |
1410 Mm |
1470 mm |
Electricals
Battery Type |
Info-Not-Available |
mf |
Battery Voltage |
Info Not Available |
12v |
Head Light |
LED |
LED with DRL |
Tail Light |
halogen |
led |
Indicators |
halogen |
led |
Features
Speedometer |
digital |
digital |
Odometer |
digital |
digital |
RPM Meter |
Digital |
Digital |
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
Single-Seat |
Passenger Grab Rail |
yes |
yes |
Engine Kill Switch |
Info-Not-Available |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts

r15 v3 vs mt 15
-
2022-01-19 03:48:00 -
imran
Explore the complete specifications of Yamaha R15 V3 and Yamaha MT 15 for an in-depth comparison.

Yamaha FZS vs Honda CB Trigger Comparison - Owner Experience
-
2016-10-01 07:12:49 -
Saleh
Yamaha FZS vs Honda CB Trigger Comparison - Owner Experience

Yamaha Saluto VS Honda CB Shine Comparison Review
-
2017-01-28 21:38:06 -
Saleh
Yamaha Saluto VS Honda CB Shine Comparison Review

Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
-
2020-03-28 21:24:26 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review

suzuki gsx r150 vs r15 v3 vs cbr 150r
-
2022-01-06 01:41:00 -
imran
You can check out the full spec of the GSX-R150, R15 V3 and the cbr 150r.

Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
