Bajaj Pulsar 180 (2011) VS Honda CBF125 (2010)
Bajaj Pulsar 180 (2011) VS Honda CBF125 (2010) Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
180 |
125 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Standard |
Standard |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
2011 |
2010 |
|
Brand Origin: |
bajaj |
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
Single cylinder, four-stroke |
|
Maximum Power |
16.63 |
10.86 |
|
Maximum Torque |
14.2 |
11.2 |
|
Bore |
|
52.4 Mm |
|
Stroke |
|
57.8 Mm |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
9.2:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
1 |
|
Valves |
|
|
|
Fuel Supply |
carburator |
Carburetor |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Manual |
Manual |
|
No of Gears |
0 |
5 |
|
Clutch Type |
Info Not Available |
Wet-multiplate |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
|
|
|
Front Suspension |
Telescooic Forks |
30mm telescopic fork, 115mm axle travel |
|
Rear Suspension |
Triple rated spring, 5 way adjustable Nitrox shock absorber |
Conventional twin shock, double tube damper with 3-step adjustable spring preload, 87mm axle travel |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Single Disc |
Single Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Drum Brake |
Drum Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
130 Mm |
|
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
1 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
No |
No |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
No |
No |
|
Rear Tire Size |
120/80-17 |
100/90-M17 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubetyre |
tubetyre |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
2035 Mm |
1955 Mm |
|
Overall Width |
765 Mm |
760 Mm |
|
Height |
1150 Mm |
1110 Mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
|
173 Mm |
|
Weight |
147.0 kg |
128.0 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
15.00 Litres |
13.00 litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1345 Mm |
1270 Mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
Info-Not-Available |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
Info Not Available |
12v |
|
Head Light |
Halogen |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
halogen |
halogen |
|
Indicators |
halogen |
halogen |
Features
|
Speedometer |
analog |
digital |
|
Odometer |
analog |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Analog |
Analog |
|
Handle Type |
Pipe handle bar |
Pipe handle bar |
|
Seat Type |
Split-Seat |
Split-Seat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
no |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
no |
yes |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Suzuki GSX-R150 vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison Review
-
2017-09-28 04:16:20 -
Saleh
The latest heartthrob Suzuki GSX-R150 & Yamaha R15 V3 already started rolling. Sequentially here is our Suzuki GSX-R150 vs Yamaha R15 V3 Comparison Review.
Yamaha FZS vs Tvs Apache RTR 150:A Comparative Review
-
2013-01-24 10:24:11 -
Shuvo
With the Yamaha FZS vs Tvs Apache RTR 150 local market scene getting hotter and more intense by the day. People are becoming more and more confused as there
Hero Honda Hunk vs Yamaha FZs
-
2013-09-12 00:20:33 -
Shuvo
Hero Honda HUNK while the other is Yamaha FZS. Hunk has been one of people choice these days prefer FZS.So let’s get on with Hero Honda Hunk vs Yamaha FZs
r15 v3 vs gixxer sf 150
-
2022-01-24 06:50:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specs of both the Yamaha r15 v3 and the suzuki gixxer sf 150.
Scooter vs Moped - Differences & Similarities
-
2019-06-25 01:35:22 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Scooter vs Moped - Differences & Similarities
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.