Aprilia SR GT 200 VS BMW C 650 GT
Aprilia SR GT 200 VS BMW C 650 GT Specifications
Bike Information
|
Bike Name: |
||
|
CC: |
200 |
650 |
|
Regular Price: |
0 BDT |
0 BDT |
|
Bike Type: |
Maxi Scooter |
Maxi Scooter |
|
Distributor/Seller: |
|
|
|
Model Year: |
|
2020 |
|
Brand Origin: |
|
|
|
Made In: |
|
|
|
Assemble In: |
|
|
Engine
|
Engine Type |
Single-cylinder 4-stroke i-get with Start & Stop system |
liquid-cooled, 4-stroke parallel-twin engine |
|
Maximum Power |
17.2 |
59.2 |
|
Maximum Torque |
16.5 |
63 |
|
Bore |
61.5 mm |
|
|
Stroke |
58.7 mm |
4-stroke parallel-twin engine |
|
Compression Ratio |
|
11.6:1 |
|
No of Cylinders |
1 |
2 |
|
Valves |
4 |
|
|
Fuel Supply |
Electronic injection |
Fuel Injection |
Transmission
|
Transmission Type |
Auto |
Auto |
|
No of Gears |
0 |
0 |
|
Clutch Type |
Dry–Centrifugal clutch |
Centrifugal |
Chassis & Suspension
|
Chassis Type |
Double cradle, in high-resistance steel tubing |
Steel tube construction with aluminium die cast unit |
|
Front Suspension |
Hydraulic telescopic fork ø 33 mm (120 mm travel) |
Upside-Down fork 40 mm |
|
Rear Suspension |
Double hydraulic shock absorber with adjustable preload (102 mm travel) |
Single-sided swing arm |
Brakes
|
Front Brake Type |
Hydraulic with wavy disc |
Dual Disc |
|
Rear Brake Type |
Wavy Disc Brake |
Disc Brake |
|
Front Brake Diameter |
220 mm |
270 mm |
|
Rear Brake Diameter |
1 |
2 |
|
Anti-Lock Braking System (ABS) |
Single-Channel |
Dualchannel |
Wheels & Tires
|
Front Tire Size |
Single-Channel |
Dualchannel |
|
Rear Tire Size |
130/70 - 13 |
160/60-ZR15 |
|
Tubeless Tires |
tubeless |
Info-Not-Available |
Dimensions
|
Overall Length |
1920 mm |
2235 mm |
|
Overall Width |
765 mm |
822 mm |
|
Height |
|
1411 mm |
|
Ground Clearance |
|
|
|
Weight |
|
241 kg |
|
Fuel Tank Capacity |
9 L |
4.60 litres |
|
Wheelbase |
1350 mm |
1591 mm |
Electricals
|
Battery Type |
mf |
mf |
|
Battery Voltage |
12v |
12v |
|
Head Light |
LED |
LED |
|
Tail Light |
led |
led |
|
Indicators |
led |
led |
Features
|
Speedometer |
Info-Not-Available |
analog |
|
Odometer |
Info-Not-Available |
digital |
|
RPM Meter |
Info-Not-Available |
Digital |
|
Handle Type |
Conventional |
Conventional |
|
Seat Type |
Single-Seat |
splitseat |
|
Passenger Grab Rail |
yes |
yes |
|
Engine Kill Switch |
Info-Not-Available |
Info-Not-Available |
Above mentioned information may not be 100% accurate. We collect information from manufacturer website and other reputed sources. Please inform us if you have found any mistake or wrong information.
Compare with similar bikes
Bike comparisons by our experts
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
-
2020-03-28 21:24:26 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Taro-GP1 VS KPR165 VS Keeway-RKR165 Feature Comparison Review
pulsar 150 vs ns 160 which is better
-
2022-02-16 07:16:00 -
imran
You can check out the full specification of both the Bajaj Pulsar 150 and Bajaj Pulsar NS 160.
Kawasaki Ninja 125 VS KTM RC125 Comparison Review
-
2019-08-17 01:15:48 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Kawasaki Ninja 125 VS KTM RC125 Comparison Review
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 VS Pulsar NS160-FI Comparison Review
-
2019-10-03 07:01:36 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Bajaj Pulsar NS160-FI redefine the 150cc segment. Both feature advanced brakes, suspensions, and differ in power, FZS-FI V3 at 13 BHP, NS160-FI at 14.8 BHP. Choose based on your preferences.
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Tvs Apache 150 RTR : A Comparison
-
2012-12-07 01:36:25 -
Arif Raihan Opu
Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs Tvs Apache 150 RTR :A Comparison
Suzuki Gixxer VS Yamaha FZS-Fi Comparison Review
-
2017-02-24 13:45:12 -
Saleh
In the 150cc air-cooled segment Suzuki Gixxer 155 and Yamaha FZS 153 is the diehard competitor BD motorcycle market. They are fighting hard with their own enhancements and features from years.
